12 October 2006 @ 08:36 pm
56 Icons: SG-1, Witchblade  
25 SG-1
09 SG-1 Cast
22 Witchblade

Teasers:
++ ++ ++ ++


STARGATE SG-1
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25


STARGATE SG-1 CAST (Amanda Tapping, Teryl Rothery)
26 27 28 29 30
31 32 33 34


WITCHBLADE
35 36 37 38 39
40 41 42 43 44
45 46 47 48 49
50 51 52 53 54
55 56


~~**~~ Table Generator by [livejournal.com profile] 77words // Photoshop Resources // Screencap Resources // All of my icons~~**~~



Comments are treasured. Credit is appreciated but, more importantly, please don't claim as your own work. Always wear a helmet when riding on motorcycles.

PLEASE NOTE: I welcome constructive criticism. I have allowed anonymous commenting on this post just in case that helps promote honesty. Thank you!
 
 
Current Mood: mellow
 
 
( Post a new comment )
ext_22444[identity profile] geonncannon.livejournal.com on October 13th, 2006 07:37 pm (UTC)
And you don't even have to meditate a lot and pontificate while stoned. What a deal. :)

Well, no, I don't have to... ;-D

I need to order me the better half a copy of the calendar & video. I meant to do it for his birthday but I actually bought him a gift he didn't have to share.

*laughs* The video is muuuch better than the calendar, IMO. They apparently did a lot of photos that they didn't use. Erica Durance and Laura Bertram are both so, so gorgeous. Rachel Luttrell, though... blergh. I mean, she's fine on Atlantis, but it's like they were TRYING to make her unattractive for the calendar. :-/

*wants Torri and Amanda in 2008* ;-D
Mish: Sam -- Pretty by me[identity profile] hsapiens.livejournal.com on October 15th, 2006 02:10 am (UTC)
Rachel Luttrell is a very pretty, almost fragile looking woman in person. She looks much younger than I would have guessed. I didn't even recognize her when she first walked into a room; she looked to be maybe 20. They've buried her under wigs and puffy clothing on SGA. It appeared they buried her in pasted on face jewels in the promo for the calendar that I saw. She has a very delicate bone structure that is better served by paring down the geegaws, in my oh so not humble opinion.

I have to admit, Torri seems too thin to me. She's looking healthier these days than when SGA first started. Amanda? Oh yeah. They should have found a way to include her if it was at all possible. Dolts.
ext_22444: Sam Considering[identity profile] geonncannon.livejournal.com on October 15th, 2006 02:14 am (UTC)
She had crap pasted all over her face, PLUS her hair was all crazy and frizzy. It did not compare to any of the other women in the calendar. Maybe he was experimenting.

And yes, Torri is MUCH lovelier now than when the show began. Her cheekbones frightened me in the original promo pics. "The bad guys suck life from humans... so did they already get ahold of Zombie!Weir?" ;-D

As for Amanda, I'm not entirely positive, but the photo shoot MAY have coincided with her pregnancy. So she may have been self-conscious about it (I don't think I've seen a single picture of her pregnant, so... makes sense).
Mish: Teryl & Amanda -- Janet/Sam[identity profile] hsapiens.livejournal.com on October 15th, 2006 02:48 am (UTC)
Poor Rachel. Nobody seems to think she looks okay as just herself. They're blind for certain.

Whatever the reason, I'm sorry Amanda wasn't in the calendar. I think Demi Moore proved that pregnant women are beautiful and ripe. I wish Amanda had been photographed because she strikes me as looking good at all stages of life.