30 May 2007 @ 04:20 pm
On the LJ Uproar  
RE: Suspension for Interests...

I'm reserving judgment until I hear from LJ. I have a couple of personal hypotheses about why they deleted a bunch of obviously "not inciting pedophilia" sites along with some comms that sound rather squicky to the uninformed outsider. Personally, I think they're making a point to some folks about "Being Careful What You Wish For" and about LJ not being willing to judge or censor based on content -- but I'd like to hear something from LJ and SOON. I'm a little more laid back than I should be but I'd rather wait for LJ's official statement AND for [livejournal.com profile] synecdochic's post explaining what has happened.

In the meantime, I'd like to note that I have a Greatest Journal account creatively named http://hsapiens.greatestjournal.com -- LJ isn't the only game in town. I'm willing to wait for an explanation that I will consider. And I'm willing to go elsewhere if I don't like it.

For now, I've deleted all my interests. Not because I'm worried about being deleted. I don't find friends that way since LJ changed the way it displays the results for a search on interests. If listing something as an interest is the same as legally promoting it, well, I need to think about what I want to *promote* before I relist my interests. I would hate to be held legally liable for for promoting the use of my favorite camera by someone who thinks it's really a faulty, piece of shit lemon that should be pulled from the market and never used by those under 8 without appropriate adult supervision that I failed to mention prominently in a disclaimer.

Also? If this is how right wing vigilantes are searching for targets, I'm all about denying them their easiest access routes. Because I am, at my core, stubborn and petty.
 
 
( Post a new comment )
Mish: Team -- Old Style (anim)[identity profile] hsapiens.livejournal.com on May 30th, 2007 11:00 pm (UTC)
I had a bunch but they were mostly random ideas that occurred to me; I don't think there's much wankery to be gotten from "Dutch Still Lifes," after all. I used to search interests to find communities back when all you got was an alphabetized list and the "Name/Description." I've come to rely more on the groups my f-listers belong to and on their pimping. :)

I have no idea if it's correct or not but it's my Just So Story; it explains in my universe about [livejournal.com profile] synecdochic's post the other day that included how LJ responds to TOS issues in an "all or nothing" manner. Even if that was ostensibly a discussion of LJ vs. Fanlib TOS.

Not that I'm at all certain she knew this was coming given some of her other posts. I'm a bit surprised that LJ hasn't posted an explanation before now and so I'm guessing that the lawyers are having to draft whatever's being said. I'm looking forward to their take/spin/story.
tejas[identity profile] tejas.livejournal.com on May 30th, 2007 11:12 pm (UTC)
I'd love to see them change their TOS to simply avoid the issue.