07 March 2006 @ 02:28 pm
Serious Stuff  
link seen in [livejournal.com profile] roundrockronin's LJ: South Dakota Bans Most Abortions, The information itself wasn't new but this quote from the esteemed governor was waving the red cape for me:

"We must help each mother to see the value of the gift that is a child, and nurture the mother for her own sake and for the sake of her child," Rounds said in the statement.

To which I reply: Pardon me if I vomit while the government kindly explains it all to poor little, confused me about how blessed I am.

Fuck. You. Very. Much.

I don't need a sanctimonious prick to make my decisions for me. I can screw up all on my own; I can succeed all on my own. I am the one who must live with the consequences, physical and emotional, of my actions. That's what being an adult is all about and consigning women to an infantalized class that must be nurtured makes me want to puke.

I really don't want to be so angry over this. I hate being angry; I don't like the person I am when I'm angry like this. Once I get over the hump of my anger, I think I'll check into what is happening with the move to amend the Constitution with an explicit statement that citizens have a right to privacy. I helped defend clinics during the 1990 1992 convention and I'd really prefer that it not be a cyclical need. I'm tired of the bullshit answers to Congress, the rear-guard action to protect choice. If my viewpoint loses, so be it but let it be an open loss rather than the death of a thousand cuts.

I'd been thinking over the past few months about the Right to Privacy, about how it relates to my fundamental morals, and about how the social issues that most distress me all stem from government encroachment on what I see as a fundamental human right.
 
 
Current Mood: livid
 
 
( Post a new comment )
superbadgirl[personal profile] superbadgirl on March 7th, 2006 11:07 pm (UTC)
It's highly alarming to me that people honestly believe it's okay to think like this. Hell, I am pretty against having an abortion - for MYself. I don't presume to have the right to tell anyone else what she can do about an unwanted (whatever the reason, let ALONE rape) pregnancy.

I think this man should also foot the bill for the pre-natal care, hospital and subsequent doctor's visits for these blessed children. Methinks that suddenly the patronizing "for her own sake" bullshit would become bluster and denial.

Mish: Cath Iz Mad[identity profile] hsapiens.livejournal.com on March 8th, 2006 02:11 am (UTC)
Yeah, see, that's what I love about being pro-choice: nobody is forced to do anything they don't want to. I can't begin to imagine the many, many ways that result in an unwanted pregnancy. In any case, the answer belongs to the person who must live with the situation and its fallout.

...the patronizing "for her own sake" bullshit would become bluster and denial

Oh, absolutely. There's a depressing tendency of those who judge others against their own morality to be consistent. Sticking around to help rather than further condemn a woman forced to become a mother isn't nearly so fun. Rather, the next time to get involved is when one or both parties end up on Welfare...or on drugs...or homeless...or in prison. Not that this is inevitable; only it's more likely when people unsuited or unwilling to be parents are forced to do so.