hsapiens: strutting human skeleton (Heroes -- Hiro "I Will Save You!")
hsapiens ([personal profile] hsapiens) wrote2009-12-15 01:37 am
Entry tags:

Yatta!

I have a new computer! (Well, a new CPU.) It runs Windows 7 -- and I'm favorably impressed. It's well-designed, it runs ALL of my favorite freeware downloads, it runs the 32-bit software I already own, and it runs all of my hardware of varying ages. Sad that this is a surprise but I'm grateful nonetheless. If I can just figure out how to make Windows Explorer show me the file extensions, I'll be a happy camper. (I'm sure I'll get used to the loss of menus in various applications but I'm slow at adapting to this particular change.)

I cannot say the same for Word 2007. What in the world did they do the menus? More importantly -- WHY?!? It took me far too long to figure out how to find, "Save As..."

In a perfect world, I'd have purchased a 27" iMac, a brand new license of Photoshop CS4 for Mac for it, and had two huge monitors. (I dream of having all the Photoshop palettes on one screen and my graphic on another.) Alas, money was the determining factor so I chose to go with a Windows box. I'm not unhappy, though, as my new toy is zippy and works with my very nice quality speakers, my printer, my monitor, my array of external hard drives, and my iPod.
ext_1645: (Team -- Fandom Has Helmet Head)

[identity profile] hsapiens.livejournal.com 2009-12-15 08:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh! One more thing I should note because Windows now comes in more flavors than Ben & Jerry's. I ended up with Windows 7 Professional 64-bit with downgrade rights to Win XP Pro. I didn't *choose* that; in fact, I was told that the computer came with XP pre-loaded and an upgrade disk for Win 7. I bought it intending to keep it as an XP machine since I *knew* all of my peripherals and programs would work.

I was not originally happy to find it was pre-loaded with 7 but figured I'd tour it before installing XP over it. I found I liked it well enough and decided to test it by installing everything I wanted to keep on it. And it has done well with it all. I haven't had time to fully test every last item and program so I don't know for certain that it won't eventually reveal weaknesses but so far it has installed all of my "normal" software (32-bit) in the right place and all of my 64-bit software in its proper location without my needing to know the details of the system. So far, I'm happy. :)
ext_1336: parker needs help (Default)

[identity profile] winterfish.livejournal.com 2009-12-16 12:43 am (UTC)(link)
I didn't *choose* that; in fact, I was told that the computer came with XP pre-loaded and an upgrade disk for Win 7.

Whut! I guess that's one way to get people to try the new operating system. O.o At least it seems to have worked out in the end.

Oh god the confusion over versions! I feel like closing my eyes and throwing a dart at the screen is the way to pick what I need. :P
ext_1645: (Sam --Technobapple)

[identity profile] hsapiens.livejournal.com 2009-12-16 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
The biggest difference between Home and Professional that *I* found important is that Pro allowed me to download Windows Virtual PC from Microsoft. What does that do? That allows me to run Windows XP if I need it. That's a HUGE security blanket in my world.

It came in handy because I thought I needed to install my full version Photoshop 7 before I used my CS2 upgrade. Windows 7 wouldn't install PS7, though. A quick pair of downloads later and look at that -- I have a window running Windows XP and it's installing my PS7! (Turns out I didn't need to install PS7 first; just putting the disk in the DVD drive was sufficient but I didn't know that at the time.) Now I can revert to XP whenever I need. So if I *do* run into anything sticky, I can solve it. Or, so I hope.

Win7 Pro has some other features but those don't mean a lot for me with my very simple set-up. If you have a home network to back up to (a server, I assume) or log-in from home to a work server, it has some enhanced features. The 64-bit version is only worth it if you're getting one of the dual or quad core machines. It is supposed to be faster; I have no proof of this. I am constantly impressed by me new system but I'm upgrading from a 10 year old computer so I may not be an unbiased judge.

Since you're thinking of purchasing a new computer, you'll probably be buying at least a dual core and so the choice between the two will probably already be made for you. :)
Edited 2009-12-16 01:20 (UTC)